Consumption in Islamic Point of View - ASSUMPTION
During the previous lesson, our lecturer asked us to prepare our
own assumption on consumption in Islamic point of view.
And seriously, it went really complicated (especially to me as the one who not really master in Microsoft Excel, how to make graph and bla bla bla). Indeed membebel sepanjang buat graph senget lah apa lah. Hampir give up -.-
But to see everyone successfully completed their homework, it happened to burn my inner spirit!
Yayy alhamdulillah kerja sekolah dah siap! Akhirnyaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
So yeahhh!! here is the result. (but i don't think this assumption is going to be accepted but at least i tried :)
And seriously, it went really complicated (especially to me as the one who not really master in Microsoft Excel, how to make graph and bla bla bla). Indeed membebel sepanjang buat graph senget lah apa lah. Hampir give up -.-
But to see everyone successfully completed their homework, it happened to burn my inner spirit!
Yayy alhamdulillah kerja sekolah dah siap! Akhirnyaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
So yeahhh!! here is the result. (but i don't think this assumption is going to be accepted but at least i tried :)
*****
ادخار
|
استهلاك
|
دخل
|
0
|
1000
|
0
|
0
|
1000
|
1000
|
200
|
1800
|
2000
|
400
|
2600
|
3000
|
600
|
3400
|
4000
|
800
|
4200
|
5000
|
1800
|
4200
|
6000
|
2800
|
4200
|
7000
|
*** Consumption’s general equation: C = a + MPC (Y) assuming MPC
value varies as the income increases.
Assumptions:
- Horizontal
line (where Y=0 until 1000). Based on this graph we assumed, the lowest amount
of consumption that everyone should consume regardless they are rich or poor is
1000 even though the current income is zero or any point before 1000 (assuming
the poor received the money from all the donations and zakat). And this is the
necessary level to achieve to get survived in life. Meanwhile in saving part we
assumed there is no dissaving as they make no loan or anything that will be
resulted as their liabilities in order to cover it back. Hence, S=0 and the
same goes to the point when income and consumption both equal to 1000, we also
assumed S=0 as all income will be used on consumption (Y=C). And what comes to
mind is, everyone should at 1000 and above because those who consume below it
we claimed as stingy (bakhl or taqtir).
-Increasing in
consumption due to increasing in income (starting from I = 2000 until 5000). As
we all know, Islamic economy agreed with the conventional where stated as the
income of individual increases, the consumption on goods and services will also
increase. But in Islam for each point of income there is a limit that we cannot
go further and consume beyond it where it called ‘waste limit’. For example, if
we earned 2000 per month so for us to consume what is below it, let say 1800
and keep the balance 200 as saving. So this method will be applied at every
point of income and that is why it will always be under the 45°
line and thus, the space in between consumption line and 45°
line we assumed a waste.
-Horizontal
line (when Y=5000 and above). In this graph we assumed 4200 is the maximum
level of consumption that an individual could spend throughout his life. So
even though the income of a person increases by time he still has to spend at
4200 or any point below and if not, we claimed he is doing a waste (israf,
tabzir or tarf), and it is forbidden in Islam. Thus, the extra
income-which we cannot consume, will directly go to saving or real investment.
-So we can make
some conclusions here: (1) Consumption in Islamic view will always increase as
the income increases but stay within the area of two limits, maximum and
minimum lines where we cannot go after these limits. (2) Saving will always
increase based on this Islamic law.
Thanks for reading :) but please don't totally believe in this urban fact hahahaha. Just an assumption bro :P
*****
Thanks for reading :) but please don't totally believe in this urban fact hahahaha. Just an assumption bro :P
Good job! Always inspiring others. Keep it up.
ReplyDeleteThank you. But I really hope to work on this better :)
Delete